06/05/2013

NEXT POST
General Accounting Plan This will therefore be the second call that compute to such effects. 3 Excludes public administrations, its autonomous bodies, public enterprises and other public bodies, as well as non-profit entities. 4. Not may obtain the status of beneficiaries persons or entities who attend any of the prohibitions in the terms laid down in article 13 of law 38/2003 of 17 November, General grants (hereinafter LGS). Article 5. Eligible expenses. 1. The budgets will be presented with a table of revenue and other expenditure. Both numbers must match. 2. In the section on income assistance requested from the Ministry of culture, that represent maximum 70% of the total project, and a specification of other revenues available for the realization of the project will be established. Minimum 30% remaining should be financed with own funds or contributions from other public or private institutions. 3. The beneficiaries of the aid are obliged to justify the totality of the costs of the project, not only the part corresponding to the aid received, as indicated in article 11 of this call. In the event the portion of funding unrelated to the Ministry of culture is based on an estimation of the possibility of receiving other aid or sponsorship not obtaining does not exempt from the obligation to have a minimum of 30% of income other than this help. 4. In the event that the applicant becomes beneficiary of the aid and the amount received is less than the quantity requested, it will act in accordance with article 9.8 of this call. 5. In the section on expenditure the total expenditure will be included to perform for the project. The amount granted by the Ministry of culture should be devoted in its entirety to expenditure on capital investment, excluding VAT. In annex III of this call...
PREVIOUS POST
TUO Court Also applicable to the holder of the entity demande his nullity via the contentious-administrative proceeding, provided that the demand is brought thereunder within three years of notified the resolution issued by the Board or tribunal. () The published standard is healthy because it raises unnecessary limitation that had the tax court to exercise its power to review their own actions, and ending by generating the apparent conflict that is its hierarchical lower which execute the also apparent control of the resolutions in the last administrative instance, via the contentious-administrative proceeding. Furthermore, this standard, in a manner consistent with the Act No. 27584, strictly allows the tax court to extend review of their actions with the use of the prejudicial effect process; and being also congruent with what was expressed in the previous item, only in the event that the tax court does not exercise that power, tax administrations may resort to article 157 of the TUO of the tax code. Finally, should sign the Decree legislative No. 1067 has modified article 17 of law No. 27584 and your numeral 2 to the letter says: 2. when the Act empowers administrative entities initiate the contentious-administrative proceeding in accordance with the second paragraph of article 11 of this law, the term shall be laid down in the General Administrative Procedure Act, except statutory provision that establishes different period. () Thus safeguarding any possibility of contradiction within the necessary deadlines for the start of the process of prejudicial effect in charge of the tax court or the contentious process initiated by the tax authorities under article 157. of the TUO of the tax code, very healthy situation. IV. conclusions taking care that the administrative acts enjoy a presumption of legitimacy, when they become not declared void ex officio in the same administrative headquarters,...